A woman - The Missing Link in the Abortion Debate

At first glance, abortion debates are all about women. It's about women's bodies, women's choices, women's freedom, women's rights. 

According to Reproductive Freedom for All, pro-abortion advocacy that endorses Monica Tranel, abortions are "Normal and Good," women must love them and be proud of having them. Pro-abortionists moved so far from "Abortions should be safe, legal, and rare" that it feels that the only reason why Democrats haven't yet come up with the slogan "If you never had an abortion, you aren't a woman" is because it contradicts with their other slogan "Transwomen are Women." It's obvious that in the post-feminist Alphabet vision of reality, any limitations on abortions are seen as a "war on women."

Yet, if we leave for a second this vision of reality, go down to the real world, and think of real women, we'll know that abortion, especially late-term abortion, is a tragedy in which, regardless of how horrific it sounds, an aborted baby is the one who suffers the least. 

There are objective reasons why most civilized countries have strict limits on elective abortions, and even France, which codified the right to an abortion in its constitution, is limiting elective abortions to 14 weeks after gestation and mandates two medical consultations before performing abortions: 1. Abortions are unnatural invasive medical procedures that cause serious physical and emotion complications; 2. We live in times when women have so many solutions to avoid unwanted pregnancies 

that abortions on demand with no questions asked only encourage irresponsibility and self-destructive behaviors among women and disrespect toward women among men.

So, why do Democrats think they can go away with denying women's rights to self-defense, to informed consent to medical treatments, to have their sports and female-dedicated places be protected from men pretending to be women, to have their parental rights being honored by the government and Teachers' Unions and win womens' voices by making abortions a centerpiece of their election campaign?

Partly, it's because they use censorship and fear-mongering anti-conservative propaganda to manipulate women and make them believe that pro-life laws ban any termination of pregnancies, even ectopic pregnancies, or when a baby dies.

Unfortunately, partly, it's because pro-life activists often make it easy by agreeing to debate on pro-abortionist terms or to shame women at times when these women are in distress and don't know what to do.

The truth is that:

Pro-abortionists are not "pro-choice;" they don't fight for women's freedom to decide, or for any women's rights, for that matter. They want women to be unwilling and unable to make responsible life choices and forever dependent on the nanny state to tell them what they can and cannot do and think. And they want money, and they know that paid by tax money abortions are a great source of profits for PP. It's what the war on women is.

Real "pro-choice" is the support of women who choose self-respect, responsibility, and legal protection from rogue doctors, corrupt politicians, and fear-mongering pseudo-science responsible for coercing them into making wrong choices they regret later in their lives. 

In Montana, all our Republican candidates fully support real "pro-choice." Please name at least one Democrat who also supports this. I'll wait.